> So when AI enters writing, a deeper question appears: does an article written with AI still belong to me?
I find that to be an uninteresting, shallow question. Yes, it “belongs” to you in the sense you are technically allowed to do with it as you please. A more relevant question is if it’s good or it matters, is it worth other people’s time and personal investment¹? For this particular post, I’d go with “no”. It’s rambling and circular and definitely too verbose given the ideas it explores. Everything in the article is summarised by the last two sentences.
¹ Obvious exceptions if you are writing something only for yourself which will never see the light of day.
AI can help me write faster, but some ideas only feel like mine after I've wrestled with them for a while.
Is instant coffee coffee?
> So when AI enters writing, a deeper question appears: does an article written with AI still belong to me?
I find that to be an uninteresting, shallow question. Yes, it “belongs” to you in the sense you are technically allowed to do with it as you please. A more relevant question is if it’s good or it matters, is it worth other people’s time and personal investment¹? For this particular post, I’d go with “no”. It’s rambling and circular and definitely too verbose given the ideas it explores. Everything in the article is summarised by the last two sentences.
¹ Obvious exceptions if you are writing something only for yourself which will never see the light of day.