4 comments

  • gertrunde 1 hour ago

    Possibly not the best choice of name...?

    (Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_Monitor in case people are unaware, usually known as... perfmon)

    • elC0mpa 3 hours ago

      Wow, looks great. Just a quick general recommendations:

      You should give a direct curl to an install.sh to provide a simpler installation step for you tool and besides I think it would be good to publish it on home brew for MacOS users.

      This post came in a good moment because I am developing a CLI and I want to add some interactivity to it in the next major version and in some way your CLI has helped me with that.

      This is my CLI (https://github.com/elC0mpa/aws-doctor)

      There you can check how I implemented the home brew distribution and the install.sh file for the easy installation step

      • jackhab 4 hours ago

        I was using tmux to consolidate TUI monitors in both tabs and panes. What's the advantage of perfmon?

        • PeterWhittaker 5 hours ago

          Looks pretty good, but would love to know this compares to bottom (btm), featurewise. Thanks!

          • paperplaneflyr 5 hours ago

            Perfmon essentially allows you to define commands you use daily, defined them in a toml file and tab them, ie customizable. It could be docker or kubernetes commands and so on. This is different from btm.

            Bottom(btm) gives just more graphical than top.

            • jrm4 5 hours ago

              Ha, I've literally never heard of bottom, and haven't looked it up yet, but it's just kind of funny doing Linux/Unix forever and knowing almost exactly what it must be about, just given the name. I'll edit this if I was wrong, but I bet I won't be.