This post is so light on the details (what? when?) that it’s impossible for me to be supportive.
OP: I suggest being MUCH more transparent when asking for help.
For all we know you are running a scam center support app. Consider the outraged posts that make it to the front page, essentially complaining about how their MLM bitcoin scam has been shut down.
This is just one of the many risks you take when your app or service is dependent on some other third party service. Even if it is run by 'the big boys' (in this case Apple), your success is dependent on their good graces.
They can kick you out and make your software the equivalent of bricked hardware; without any means to appeal their decisions.
They aren't dependent on a third-party "service", exactly. If you make software for phones, the most popular hardware platform in the world @ 8 billion devices, you are at the complete mercy of Apple/Google, period.
'Recently', how long are we talking here? You've already emailed the execs, if they think it's worthy of review they'll assign someone to you, it can take a few days.
If you would, please re-read the part of the original post where the author talks about how families in Africa are literally losing their daily income. I’m guessing “a few days” can make a big difference here.
Unfortunately you probably need to think abou this from the point of view of an anti-fraud/abuse team. How would you differentiate between a business that had an employee go rogue and a business deliberately trying to cause harm and get away with it?
Claiming you fired the party responsible isn’t very convincing, honestly, especially if it’s hard to verify: was it an alias? did the employee only exist on paper? are they still around just not “employeed”, were they a designated patsy? Nor are claims that you revamped your security, which doesn’t address the root problem of whether it was intentional behaviour or not. And what’s worse, the natural urgency and appeals to emotion that you include in your story are unfortunately widely used tactics by scammers to try to get a human to bend rules to their benefit, and reviewers are trained to treat them as such. You need hard evidence.
How can you demonstrate that you didn’t know what the employee was doing? Have you reported the employee to the police? Is there a criminal case you can point to? Simply having a bad process before could very easily have been an intentional way to avoid knowledge of wrong doing, another common tactic used by criminal orgs.
If we're going feudal, it would be a good idea to provide justice to the commoners like feudal lords were obliged to do.
I.e. all these "tech companies" that want to people to have accounts (and be heavily invested and/or dependent on them) should not be able to cancel those accounts without due process. This should be a legal requirement for them to operate at all.
I love this thread full of people asking "what did the employee do?" and not "why do Apple and Google have the right to control distribution of all mobile software with no recourse?". It honestly does not matter, in any way, what the employee did. Apple should not be the final arbiter of who is allowed to develop mobile software.
Honestly, HN is a great customer support forum considering so many posts actually get treated better than just using the standard customer support (many startups and other companies paying attention to it helps a bunch). It has to have more merit some of the time (this is not to say it is an assessment of what you are saying at all.
I am very sorry for your loss and the harm it is causing you.
Unfortunately, this is one of the risks of handing control over your future to the tyrants who run walled gardens.
While you can't undo the past, the silver lining of this experience is that it has clarified to you that Apple is an abusive, unfair, and unreasonable corporation that you should avoid doing business with.
As an immediate action, I'm sure it's not what you want to hear, but HTML5 and WASM have come a long way, and mobile web applications are increasingly converging on the capabilities of native mobile applications. While a rewrite will not be cheap or easy, ensuring you can offer service to your users without having to ask an abusive tyrant for permission ensures you are at less risk of this kind of tyranny and the disruption and harm it inflicts upon you and your users in the future.
I am sympathetic to the victims of Apple's tyranny (as well as Google's, Microsoft's, and others), and I know I can't solve the problem by myself, but I would like to help in a more material way - do you have a Bitcoin address I can send a donation to?
This post is so light on the details (what? when?) that it’s impossible for me to be supportive.
OP: I suggest being MUCH more transparent when asking for help.
For all we know you are running a scam center support app. Consider the outraged posts that make it to the front page, essentially complaining about how their MLM bitcoin scam has been shut down.
sorry for not including details, we do not know why the account got terminated exactly, were suspecting leaked certs
This is just one of the many risks you take when your app or service is dependent on some other third party service. Even if it is run by 'the big boys' (in this case Apple), your success is dependent on their good graces.
They can kick you out and make your software the equivalent of bricked hardware; without any means to appeal their decisions.
Yes. Want to keep it that way? Or what are you working on?
They aren't dependent on a third-party "service", exactly. If you make software for phones, the most popular hardware platform in the world @ 8 billion devices, you are at the complete mercy of Apple/Google, period.
web is the way
How about your android version?
How hard it will be to rewrite it for the web?
If it's react native or flutter probably not that hard, you can go back online with some struggle, but it's at least a way.
it could take month to get a working pwa version, but its a must even if the issue get fixed we will create one
no issue with google.
Just what sort of unauthorized activities are we talking here?
I presume the kind that would prejudice against helping.
'Recently', how long are we talking here? You've already emailed the execs, if they think it's worthy of review they'll assign someone to you, it can take a few days.
If you would, please re-read the part of the original post where the author talks about how families in Africa are literally losing their daily income. I’m guessing “a few days” can make a big difference here.
Unfortunately you probably need to think abou this from the point of view of an anti-fraud/abuse team. How would you differentiate between a business that had an employee go rogue and a business deliberately trying to cause harm and get away with it?
Claiming you fired the party responsible isn’t very convincing, honestly, especially if it’s hard to verify: was it an alias? did the employee only exist on paper? are they still around just not “employeed”, were they a designated patsy? Nor are claims that you revamped your security, which doesn’t address the root problem of whether it was intentional behaviour or not. And what’s worse, the natural urgency and appeals to emotion that you include in your story are unfortunately widely used tactics by scammers to try to get a human to bend rules to their benefit, and reviewers are trained to treat them as such. You need hard evidence.
How can you demonstrate that you didn’t know what the employee was doing? Have you reported the employee to the police? Is there a criminal case you can point to? Simply having a bad process before could very easily have been an intentional way to avoid knowledge of wrong doing, another common tactic used by criminal orgs.
Best of luck.
we sent supporting paperwork to apple, and a simple search from their end will confirm things
I hope you get this sorted !
thanks
If we're going feudal, it would be a good idea to provide justice to the commoners like feudal lords were obliged to do.
I.e. all these "tech companies" that want to people to have accounts (and be heavily invested and/or dependent on them) should not be able to cancel those accounts without due process. This should be a legal requirement for them to operate at all.
I love this thread full of people asking "what did the employee do?" and not "why do Apple and Google have the right to control distribution of all mobile software with no recourse?". It honestly does not matter, in any way, what the employee did. Apple should not be the final arbiter of who is allowed to develop mobile software.
Isn't that what the web is for?
we suspect leaked certs
What did the employee do?
Honestly, HN is a great customer support forum considering so many posts actually get treated better than just using the standard customer support (many startups and other companies paying attention to it helps a bunch). It has to have more merit some of the time (this is not to say it is an assessment of what you are saying at all.
What is their second chance policy for incidents of misuse, generally?
I mean, you're straight up saying your team violated the Dev Terms of Service. That's kinda game over.
I am very sorry for your loss and the harm it is causing you.
Unfortunately, this is one of the risks of handing control over your future to the tyrants who run walled gardens.
While you can't undo the past, the silver lining of this experience is that it has clarified to you that Apple is an abusive, unfair, and unreasonable corporation that you should avoid doing business with.
As an immediate action, I'm sure it's not what you want to hear, but HTML5 and WASM have come a long way, and mobile web applications are increasingly converging on the capabilities of native mobile applications. While a rewrite will not be cheap or easy, ensuring you can offer service to your users without having to ask an abusive tyrant for permission ensures you are at less risk of this kind of tyranny and the disruption and harm it inflicts upon you and your users in the future.
I am sympathetic to the victims of Apple's tyranny (as well as Google's, Microsoft's, and others), and I know I can't solve the problem by myself, but I would like to help in a more material way - do you have a Bitcoin address I can send a donation to?
we just need a human to read our appeal